1 min readDefine Underperformance Correctly
by Guy Gage | February 27, 2022 | Business, Leadership

From A Partner
I had a great coaching call with a partner this week about one of his staff who is not performing to her optimal capabilities. He shared his theory about what was going on and what he was doing to address them. He said he gave her direct feedback so that she would know exactly where the problems were and what she needed to do to improve. Just like that. Bada Bing. Bada Boom. Next?
Hold on there, Sparky. As we talked, it became clear to me that there may be more going on that what the partner may have realized. And his solutions may not get the results he’s expecting.
It’s Not What You Think
This led me to once again be keenly aware that the way you define the situation determines the pool of solutions you draw from to address it.
For instance, if someone isn’t performing optimally, it could be for a number of reasons. Here are ones I’ve encountered over the years.
- They don’t know what to do
- They are led to believe that minimal effort is acceptable
- They are not motivated
- They lack a sense of ownership for their work
- They have shaky confidence in their ability
And there are more.
- Their personal life isn’t working
- They aren’t getting along with their manager
- They have physical or mental health issues
Each of these are different enough that the ways you respond to them will vary as well. For instance, if you think that someone is capable of a higher quality of work than what they are producing, you could determine it is because they are not motivated to put for the required effort. If this your conclusion, you would encourage them to be more diligent or hold them accountable in some way.
Getting It Wrong
However, what if the reason for under-performance was because they can’t say no and they have accumulated a load of work that is overwhelming? All of your encouragement in the world or holding them accountable for quality won’t help at all. In fact, you may end up discouraging them to the point that they decide to work someplace else. All because you defined the problem wrong. And of course, when they leave, you conclude it is because they aren’t a good fit. Or they don’t have what it takes.
Getting It Right
It is true—how you define situations will drive the pool of solutions you will draw from to fix them. So be thoughtful enough and define the situation correctly so that your solutions actually fix the problem and not create new ones.
Read Related Blogs:
Protect Your Attention
As we've written and said so many times (here, here and here), no one aspires to be mediocre. Everyone wants to do well. So why don't we? A major reason is we aren't protecting our attention. Our attention is precious and it’s a huge influence in our progress in...
From Sprint to Strategy: Recharge, Reorganize, and Show Up Stronger for the Next Season
You’ve crossed the finish line of another sprint - now comes the moment to pause, breathe, and regroup. The tricky part? The period before year-end often feels like another race in disguise. As firm leaders, you can either get swept up in the rush or choose to use...
Weak Link Choices
Most under-performance doesn’t come from lack of intelligence or capability. It comes from choosing what is easy, comfortable, or convenient - small compromises that depreciate into mediocrity. High performers see it immediately. At first they push back. Over time,...

